Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 127.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Pima	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	3.6%	1.0%
Maximum	100.0%	12.9%
Range	96.4%	11.9%
Mean	19.6%	6.0%
Median	9.9%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.4%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.4%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.0%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.2%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.7%	2.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 8.3%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 8.4%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 8.7%
Apache	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 9.0%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 9.0%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 9.4%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 9.6%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 9.7%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 11.1%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 11.2%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 11.4%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 11.9%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 12.6%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 12.8%
Yup'ik	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 13.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%
Brazilians	78.3 /100 \| #150	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%