Bahamian vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,412,919 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 31.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bahamian	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	1.6%	1.0%
Maximum	43.3%	12.9%
Range	41.8%	11.9%
Mean	8.9%	6.0%
Median	6.8%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.5%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.9%	7.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.7%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.6%	2.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Bahamians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.29%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 6.5%
Salvadorans	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 6.5%
Nepalese	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 6.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 6.5%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 6.5%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 6.6%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 6.6%
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 6.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 6.6%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 6.6%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 6.6%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 6.7%
Nicaraguans	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 6.7%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 6.7%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 6.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	83.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 5.0%
Hmong	83.2 /100 \| #144	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Spain	79.9 /100 \| #145	Good 5.0%
Mongolians	79.8 /100 \| #146	Good 5.0%
Syrians	78.7 /100 \| #147	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	78.7 /100 \| #148	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	78.6 /100 \| #149	Good 5.0%
Brazilians	78.3 /100 \| #150	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	77.3 /100 \| #151	Good 5.0%
Albanians	77.2 /100 \| #152	Good 5.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	76.3 /100 \| #153	Good 5.0%
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%