Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cabo Verde
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cabo Verde
Immigrants from Oceania
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
30.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,016,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cabo Verde | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.81% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 13.1% | 12.9% |
Range | 12.3% | 11.9% |
Mean | 5.2% | 6.0% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cabo Verde are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |