Pima vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Malaysian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Pima
Malaysians
11.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
29.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Malaysian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,466,640 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,983,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 113.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 17.9% |
| Range | 96.4% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 9.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.7% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
| Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
| South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |