Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cambodia
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cambodia
Immigrants from Oceania
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,385,428 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,370,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 12.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cambodia | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 12.9% |
Range | 34.9% | 11.9% |
Mean | 11.2% | 6.0% |
Median | 6.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cambodia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Sudanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), South American (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Fiji (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Cajun (5.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |