Mongolian vs Armenian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Armenian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Armenians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Armenian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,074,733 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Armenian |
Minimum | 0.58% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 23.4% | 22.0% |
Range | 22.8% | 19.0% |
Mean | 8.0% | 8.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Armenians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |