Osage vs Ugandan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
Ugandan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
Ugandans
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
17.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Ugandan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,523,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 7.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Ugandan |
Minimum | 6.7% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 67.2% | 51.6% |
Range | 60.5% | 49.5% |
Mean | 21.1% | 17.1% |
Median | 19.5% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |