Osage vs Malaysian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
Malaysian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
Malaysians
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Malaysian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,243,890 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Malaysian |
Minimum | 6.7% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 67.2% | 60.0% |
Range | 60.5% | 59.2% |
Mean | 21.1% | 21.1% |
Median | 19.5% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 25.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Malaysians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |