Osage vs French American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
French American Indian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
French American Indians
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs French American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,073,161 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 3.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | French American Indian |
Minimum | 6.7% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 67.2% | 68.1% |
Range | 60.5% | 65.1% |
Mean | 21.1% | 26.9% |
Median | 19.5% | 21.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 36.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and French American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |