Osage vs Cape Verdean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
Cape Verdean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
Cape Verdeans
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Cape Verdean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,748,035 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 3.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Cape Verdean |
Minimum | 6.7% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 67.2% | 45.2% |
Range | 60.5% | 41.3% |
Mean | 21.1% | 17.9% |
Median | 19.5% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 24.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Cape Verdeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 0.030%), French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Shoshone (18.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |