Norwegian vs Sierra Leonean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Sierra Leonean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Sierra Leoneans
3.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
64.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Sierra Leonean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 522,229,251 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,227,965 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 38.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.45% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 10.4% |
| Range | 48.8% | 9.9% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 4.3% |
| Median | 3.4% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |