Norwegian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Luxembourgers
3.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 522,229,251 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 4.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 15.5% |
| Range | 48.8% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 3.7% |
| Median | 3.4% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 0.61%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |