Norwegian vs Sierra Leonean Family Households
COMPARE
Norwegian
Sierra Leonean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Norwegians
Sierra Leoneans
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Sierra Leonean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,913,401 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.060%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 33.3% | 55.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 87.8% |
Range | 66.7% | 31.8% |
Mean | 66.0% | 67.7% |
Median | 64.2% | 65.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.1% | 60.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 72.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Sierra Leoneans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |