Norwegian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
3.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
23.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 522,229,251 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,849,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 45.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 12.6% |
Range | 48.8% | 11.1% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Median | 3.4% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |