Norwegian vs Central American Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Central American
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Central Americans
3.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Central American Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 522,229,251 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,895,847 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 81.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Central American |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 41.9% |
| Range | 48.8% | 39.8% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 9.7% |
| Median | 3.4% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Ecuador (6.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Cuban (6.8%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |