Swedish vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Luxembourger
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Luxembourgers
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Luxembourger Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,096,192 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,792,583 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 0.61%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Maximum | 87.5% | 15.5% |
| Range | 86.9% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 3.7% |
| Median | 3.4% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Luxembourgers by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.7%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |