Cree vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Cree
Chippewa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Cree
Chippewa
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,883,921 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 11.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cree | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.8% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.2% | 92.5% |
Mean | 24.0% | 37.7% |
Median | 19.0% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 56.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 37.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 25.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Cree by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |