Comanche vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Comanche
Chippewa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Comanche
Chippewa
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,392,517 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 2.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Chippewa |
Minimum | 5.6% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.4% | 92.5% |
Mean | 26.3% | 37.7% |
Median | 22.5% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.2% | 56.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 37.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Chippewa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Haitian (20.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |