Marshallese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Marshallese
Guamanian/Chamorro
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Marshallese
Guamanians/Chamorros
18.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,733,335 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,387,643 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 17.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 8.7% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.3% | 98.0% |
Mean | 28.9% | 23.8% |
Median | 19.2% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.5% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.3% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.3% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.3% | 23.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |