Maltese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Guamanian/Chamorro
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Maltese
Guamanians/Chamorros
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Guamanian/Chamorro Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,387,643 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 16.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 80.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 79.3% | 98.0% |
Mean | 18.7% | 23.8% |
Median | 15.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 23.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |