Maltese vs Ethiopian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Ethiopian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Maltese
Ethiopians
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Ethiopian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,230,982 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 20.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 80.5% | 45.6% |
Range | 79.3% | 43.5% |
Mean | 18.7% | 16.3% |
Median | 15.0% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.53%), Hungarian (16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from South America (16.4%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and White/Caucasian (16.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Hungarians | 45.1 /100 | #176 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 44.1 /100 | #177 | Average 16.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 43.6 /100 | #178 | Average 16.6% |
Hawaiians | 43.4 /100 | #179 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 43.3 /100 | #180 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 43.2 /100 | #181 | Average 16.6% |