Maltese vs Swedish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Swedish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Maltese
Swedes
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Swedish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 519,531,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 0.050%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Swedish |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 80.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 79.3% | 97.3% |
Mean | 18.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 15.0% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 21.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 25.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 25.6% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Swedes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |