Maltese vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Maltese
Cherokee
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Maltese
Cherokee
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,336,049 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 45.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Cherokee |
Minimum | 1.2% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 80.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 79.3% | 94.7% |
Mean | 18.7% | 30.7% |
Median | 15.0% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 34.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |