Japanese vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Africa
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,521,718 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Africa |
Minimum | 0.66% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 45.9% | 42.2% |
Range | 45.3% | 40.0% |
Mean | 14.7% | 13.1% |
Median | 11.0% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |