Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Alaskan Athabascans
10.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,175,970 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 31.7% | 76.9% |
| Range | 28.7% | 74.9% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 18.8% |
| Median | 11.1% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Cree (10.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |