Laotian vs Houma Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Laotian
Houma
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Laotians
Houma
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Houma Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,840 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 47.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Houma |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 37.1% |
Range | 32.7% | 33.5% |
Mean | 14.7% | 19.0% |
Median | 14.2% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Houma by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |