Laotian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Laotian
Czech
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Laotians
Czechs
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Czech Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,185,036 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Czech |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 36.4% |
Range | 32.7% | 35.4% |
Mean | 14.7% | 14.7% |
Median | 14.2% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Czechs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.5%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |