Laotian vs Finnish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Laotian
Finnish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Laotians
Finns
14.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Finnish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,065,953 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Finns and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Finnish |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 35.0% | 60.3% |
Range | 32.7% | 57.9% |
Mean | 14.7% | 17.7% |
Median | 14.2% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 21.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Finns by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.43%), Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (14.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Macedonian (14.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |