Laotian vs Immigrants from Serbia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,726,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,662,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Laotian	Immigrants from Serbia
Minimum	2.3%	2.4%
Maximum	35.0%	49.6%
Range	32.7%	47.1%
Mean	14.7%	13.8%
Median	14.2%	12.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.6%	7.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.4%	17.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.8%	9.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.9%	9.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	9.3%

Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from Serbia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Argentina (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Belgium (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Italians	99.1 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Luxembourgers	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Estonians	98.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	98.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.6%