Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Houma Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Houma
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Houma
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Houma Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,618,097 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,699,840 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 53.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Houma |
Minimum | 1.5% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 44.0% | 37.1% |
Range | 42.5% | 33.5% |
Mean | 14.5% | 19.0% |
Median | 11.7% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Bolivia (14.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Australia (14.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Korean (14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Asia (14.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Houma by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |