Jordanian vs Immigrants from Armenia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from Armenia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from Armenia
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Armenia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,216,113 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 0.82%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from Armenia |
Minimum | 1.0% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 48.3% |
Range | 33.7% | 45.0% |
Mean | 17.3% | 18.8% |
Median | 17.8% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from Armenia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |