Jordanian vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Immigrants from China
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 2.9% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 39.7% | 26.5% |
Range | 36.8% | 23.9% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.9% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.47%), Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |