Jordanian vs Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Tlingit-Haida
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Tlingit-Haida
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,909 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 39.7% | 32.4% |
| Range | 36.8% | 29.1% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 14.0% |
| Median | 10.9% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Tlingit-Haida by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and British (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |