Jordanian vs British Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
British
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
British
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs British Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | British |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 39.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.8% | 97.3% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 18.5% |
| Median | 10.9% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 18.1% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and British by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |