Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from China
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 72.8% | 26.5% |
| Range | 70.1% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.6% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |