Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from China
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from China
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from China Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,592,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 6.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 26.5% |
| Range | 20.6% | 23.9% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.8% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |