Inupiat vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Inupiat
Turkish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Inupiat
Turks
20.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Turkish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,999,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 51.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Turkish |
Minimum | 5.0% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 65.5% | 71.9% |
Range | 60.5% | 71.4% |
Mean | 30.6% | 13.5% |
Median | 23.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.8% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (20.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Mexican (20.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |