Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,525,244 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 20.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Indian (Asian)	Immigrants from Northern Africa
Minimum	1.3%	6.2%
Maximum	27.7%	78.6%
Range	26.3%	72.3%
Mean	11.5%	22.9%
Median	10.6%	16.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.3%	12.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.2%	24.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	11.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.3%	16.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Okinawans	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 13.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.1%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Chile	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
Syrians	76.7 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	76.1 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Colombians	76.1 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Slovaks	75.2 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
French	72.8 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	72.0 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
French Canadians	68.7 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	68.4 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Colombia	67.8 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	67.3 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
South Americans	67.2 /100 \| #166	Good 16.1%
Uruguayans	64.7 /100 \| #167	Good 16.2%
Yugoslavians	64.4 /100 \| #168	Good 16.2%