Yakama vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yakama
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yakama
Immigrants from Northern Africa
22.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,841,501 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 40.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.0% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 87.7% | 78.6% |
Range | 85.7% | 72.3% |
Mean | 29.9% | 22.9% |
Median | 25.6% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 24.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.4% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Colville (22.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |