Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Alaska Natives
Immigrants from Northern Africa
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,513,999 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,657,809 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 11.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaska Native | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.9% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.6% |
Range | 97.1% | 72.3% |
Mean | 34.7% | 22.9% |
Median | 25.1% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 24.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 34.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.7% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Panama (17.9%, a difference of 0.24%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are French (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |