Immigrants from Western Africa vs Iroquois Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Africa
Iroquois
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Africa
Iroquois
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Africa vs Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,059,325 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,014,123 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.23%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Africa | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 28.4% | 98.5% |
Mean | 11.9% | 15.6% |
Median | 10.8% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa and Iroquois by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |