Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Iroquois Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Iroquois
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Iroquois
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,249,707 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,014,123 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 81.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 80.8% | 98.5% |
Mean | 11.1% | 15.6% |
Median | 9.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Iroquois by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |