Comanche vs Iroquois Family Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Iroquois
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Iroquois
11.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,722,823 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,014,123 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 3.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Iroquois |
Minimum | 4.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.7% | 98.5% |
Mean | 14.5% | 15.6% |
Median | 13.1% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Iroquois by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from El Salvador (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Jamaican (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |