Immigrants from Sudan vs Iroquois Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Iroquois
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Iroquois
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Iroquois Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,923,711 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,014,123 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.0% | 98.5% |
Mean | 11.4% | 15.6% |
Median | 9.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Iroquois by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.81%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.86%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cherokee (10.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |