Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Burmese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Burmese
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Burmese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 4.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Burmese |
Minimum | 0.33% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 23.5% |
Range | 14.0% | 22.2% |
Mean | 6.6% | 8.2% |
Median | 6.2% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Burmese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Italian (9.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |