Korean vs Burmese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Burmese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Burmese
9.9%
MALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Burmese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,064,453 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Burmese |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 23.5% |
| Range | 16.0% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 8.2% |
| Median | 8.5% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Burmese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Cypriot (9.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (9.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |