Iranian vs Burmese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Burmese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Burmese
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Burmese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,583,039 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 23.5% |
| Range | 20.3% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 8.2% |
| Median | 7.4% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Burmese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Czech (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |