Immigrants from South Central Asia vs British West Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
British West Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
British West Indians
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs British West Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,618,428 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 57.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | British West Indian |
Minimum | 0.33% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 30.9% |
Range | 14.0% | 30.7% |
Mean | 6.6% | 12.5% |
Median | 6.2% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Chippewa (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |