Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Bolivian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Bolivian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Bolivians
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Bolivian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,354,703 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.620 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,589,682 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Bolivian |
Minimum | 0.33% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 29.9% |
Range | 14.0% | 28.3% |
Mean | 6.6% | 8.6% |
Median | 6.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Bolivians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Filipino (9.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |