Immigrants from Serbia vs Tongan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Tongan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Tongans
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Tongan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,723,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Tongan |
Minimum | 1.5% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 29.2% | 22.7% |
Range | 27.7% | 17.6% |
Mean | 10.9% | 11.8% |
Median | 10.4% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Tongans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |